<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FreeMarketUnderBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog</link>
	<description>There's no need to fear, Free Market Underblog is here!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:03:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLARIFY THE 2ND AMENDMENT &#8211; THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS by Stephen McGregor</title>
		<link>http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?page_id=18&#038;cpage=1#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen McGregor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?page_id=18#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>Well, I must agree with you.  There can be no other reason for writing the Second Amendment in than to give us INDIVIDUAL Rights.  The others mention THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE, and they all are INDIVIDUAL Rights.  

And all Countries have Armies, and Bear Arms.  So, who could claim that it was just about the idea that the people could serve in the Army and Bear Arms as US Soldiers.

Good Blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I must agree with you.  There can be no other reason for writing the Second Amendment in than to give us INDIVIDUAL Rights.  The others mention THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE, and they all are INDIVIDUAL Rights.  </p>
<p>And all Countries have Armies, and Bear Arms.  So, who could claim that it was just about the idea that the people could serve in the Army and Bear Arms as US Soldiers.</p>
<p>Good Blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About FREE MARKET UNDERDOG by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?page_id=2&#038;cpage=1#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>It is well worth noting -- and this page looks like a good place for it -- that power originates in the individual.  ALL government power is *delegated* power.  The government has no power that we don&#039;t specifically grant it.

This also means that if we don&#039;t have a particular power, then we certainly can&#039;t give what we don&#039;t have.  That means that for any action, if you can&#039;t justly do it to your neighbor, then neither can the government.

The government gets away with much more than it should because we unwittingly have cooperated with deceptions that rob us of property rights and freedom.  For example, a new car really comes with a &quot;Statement of Origin&quot; from the factory (proof of ownership).  The dealership signs a contract with the state to *surrender* the Statement to the state, which the state then microfilms and shreds, guaranteeing that it will forevermore remain partial owner of that car.  Since the state is partial owner of your car, it can dictate how you use it, when you use it, etceteras.  When you pay off the car, the state sends you a &quot;Certificate of Title,&quot; which is NOT the same thing as the Title.  If you had the title, aka the Statement of Origin, then you would own the car outright.  You simply partially own it, and thereby you must come to agreement with the co-owner on the use of your car.  The co-owner does not compromise or negotiate, though.  One of the things dictated to us is that we sign a contract to submit to a set of rules and regulations so voluminous that they surpass the knowable.  This voluntary contract, that is demanded of us to use the state-owned vehicles, is the driver&#039;s license.

So, in effect, we have given up our property rights for something we spend tens of thousands of dollars to obtain.  We submit ourselves to a system of rules and regulations so massive that no one can memorize it, providing for nearly limitless possibilities to further lose property (fines, tickets, impound) and freedom (jail).  And we greatly and unnecessarily restrict our freedom to travel.  (There are many ways to obtain peace, safety, and order; sacrificing freedom and rights should never be a consideration.)

The key to unravelling the big knots that deny our freedoms and rights is simply education, as this website apparently sets out to do.

&quot;If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.&quot; --Thomas Jefferson

Educate yourselves and others.  Now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is well worth noting &#8212; and this page looks like a good place for it &#8212; that power originates in the individual.  ALL government power is *delegated* power.  The government has no power that we don&#8217;t specifically grant it.</p>
<p>This also means that if we don&#8217;t have a particular power, then we certainly can&#8217;t give what we don&#8217;t have.  That means that for any action, if you can&#8217;t justly do it to your neighbor, then neither can the government.</p>
<p>The government gets away with much more than it should because we unwittingly have cooperated with deceptions that rob us of property rights and freedom.  For example, a new car really comes with a &#8220;Statement of Origin&#8221; from the factory (proof of ownership).  The dealership signs a contract with the state to *surrender* the Statement to the state, which the state then microfilms and shreds, guaranteeing that it will forevermore remain partial owner of that car.  Since the state is partial owner of your car, it can dictate how you use it, when you use it, etceteras.  When you pay off the car, the state sends you a &#8220;Certificate of Title,&#8221; which is NOT the same thing as the Title.  If you had the title, aka the Statement of Origin, then you would own the car outright.  You simply partially own it, and thereby you must come to agreement with the co-owner on the use of your car.  The co-owner does not compromise or negotiate, though.  One of the things dictated to us is that we sign a contract to submit to a set of rules and regulations so voluminous that they surpass the knowable.  This voluntary contract, that is demanded of us to use the state-owned vehicles, is the driver&#8217;s license.</p>
<p>So, in effect, we have given up our property rights for something we spend tens of thousands of dollars to obtain.  We submit ourselves to a system of rules and regulations so massive that no one can memorize it, providing for nearly limitless possibilities to further lose property (fines, tickets, impound) and freedom (jail).  And we greatly and unnecessarily restrict our freedom to travel.  (There are many ways to obtain peace, safety, and order; sacrificing freedom and rights should never be a consideration.)</p>
<p>The key to unravelling the big knots that deny our freedoms and rights is simply education, as this website apparently sets out to do.</p>
<p>&#8220;If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.&#8221; &#8211;Thomas Jefferson</p>
<p>Educate yourselves and others.  Now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When will GE fail? by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?page_id=27&#038;cpage=1#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?page_id=27#comment-1197</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d also like to throw in that GE is one of the biggest defense contractors, and it also owns CNBC, MSNBC, Bravo, Mun2TV, Sci-Fi channel, Trio, USA network, and many others.

This sure looks like a conflict of interest to me.  While I support the free market, getting the news from a company that profits handsomely from war just doesn&#039;t work.  The founders warned us ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also like to throw in that GE is one of the biggest defense contractors, and it also owns CNBC, MSNBC, Bravo, Mun2TV, Sci-Fi channel, Trio, USA network, and many others.</p>
<p>This sure looks like a conflict of interest to me.  While I support the free market, getting the news from a company that profits handsomely from war just doesn&#8217;t work.  The founders warned us &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLARIFY THE 2ND AMENDMENT &#8211; THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?page_id=18&#038;cpage=1#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?page_id=18#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>I would like to see a follow-up article on this subject after you&#039;ve read more.  It&#039;s a good start, but it&#039;s &quot;soft.&quot; Statements like &quot;I think,&quot; or, &quot;In my opinion,&quot; aren&#039;t very strong.  Quote the Founders; quote Supreme Court cases; quote statistics.  You are on the right track, but so much more can be said, with so much more force.

I&#039;ve heard that the book, &quot;Unintended Consequences,&quot; by John Ross is quite good, but I have not yet been able to read it.  There are also lots of sources available from gunowners.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see a follow-up article on this subject after you&#8217;ve read more.  It&#8217;s a good start, but it&#8217;s &#8220;soft.&#8221; Statements like &#8220;I think,&#8221; or, &#8220;In my opinion,&#8221; aren&#8217;t very strong.  Quote the Founders; quote Supreme Court cases; quote statistics.  You are on the right track, but so much more can be said, with so much more force.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that the book, &#8220;Unintended Consequences,&#8221; by John Ross is quite good, but I have not yet been able to read it.  There are also lots of sources available from gunowners.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MODIFY THE 16TH AMENDMENT (INCOME TAX) by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?page_id=15&#038;cpage=1#comment-1195</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?page_id=15#comment-1195</guid>
		<description>First, the federal income tax does not pay for any government service, and never has.  Getting rid of it would not mean sacrificing any government services.  It pays the interest on the loan of all existing money (borrowed from the Federal Reserve) -- money that should be made by the government according to the Constitution instead of borrowed into existence and immediately accruing interest that can only be repaid by borrowing more money at interest.

Second, the founders were adamant that situations should be handled at the lowest levels of governmet possible, with the federal gov taking care of only federal matters.  Government starts with the self, then the family, then community, then the county, then the state.  Schools should not answer to the federal gov, but should answer to the parents, which would be the community or county level.  The Constitution specifically forbids the federal government from being involved in anything not specifically delegated to it by the Constitution, either originally or by ammendment.

Third, my shirt is my property.  The benefits of my shirt are mine; the ability to control my shirt are mine.  I may burn it, give it away, or wear it, but it cannot justly be taken from me.  I am the only determinant of its benefits -- I decide whether it will give me warmth or not.  I cannot be forced to give the benefit of its warth to any other.  Likewise, my body is mine, as are its benefits, such as the fruits of its labor.  I cannot be forced to give the benefits of my property to others.  That would be socialist/communist.  Therefore, wages -- income from work -- are private property, not subject to looting by anyone for any reason.

All this aside, I am appreciative and thankful for the effort you&#039;ve put forth in creating and maintaining this website.  You are fighting the good fight, and I fight with you.  If I may offer a book to increase your knowledge and thereby increase your ability to fight: The 5000 Year Leap, by Skousen

Thanks, and take care.
Nathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the federal income tax does not pay for any government service, and never has.  Getting rid of it would not mean sacrificing any government services.  It pays the interest on the loan of all existing money (borrowed from the Federal Reserve) &#8212; money that should be made by the government according to the Constitution instead of borrowed into existence and immediately accruing interest that can only be repaid by borrowing more money at interest.</p>
<p>Second, the founders were adamant that situations should be handled at the lowest levels of governmet possible, with the federal gov taking care of only federal matters.  Government starts with the self, then the family, then community, then the county, then the state.  Schools should not answer to the federal gov, but should answer to the parents, which would be the community or county level.  The Constitution specifically forbids the federal government from being involved in anything not specifically delegated to it by the Constitution, either originally or by ammendment.</p>
<p>Third, my shirt is my property.  The benefits of my shirt are mine; the ability to control my shirt are mine.  I may burn it, give it away, or wear it, but it cannot justly be taken from me.  I am the only determinant of its benefits &#8212; I decide whether it will give me warmth or not.  I cannot be forced to give the benefit of its warth to any other.  Likewise, my body is mine, as are its benefits, such as the fruits of its labor.  I cannot be forced to give the benefits of my property to others.  That would be socialist/communist.  Therefore, wages &#8212; income from work &#8212; are private property, not subject to looting by anyone for any reason.</p>
<p>All this aside, I am appreciative and thankful for the effort you&#8217;ve put forth in creating and maintaining this website.  You are fighting the good fight, and I fight with you.  If I may offer a book to increase your knowledge and thereby increase your ability to fight: The 5000 Year Leap, by Skousen</p>
<p>Thanks, and take care.<br />
Nathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Response to Down Town DJ Brown by Al</title>
		<link>http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?p=21&#038;cpage=1#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?p=21#comment-98</guid>
		<description>I think we should see how it goes to start pushing anarchistic socialism.  You can blast damn near everything from that stance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should see how it goes to start pushing anarchistic socialism.  You can blast damn near everything from that stance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES I&#8217;D LIKE TO SEE by Jeff Fullerton</title>
		<link>http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?page_id=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Fullerton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?page_id=14#comment-72</guid>
		<description>How about requiring a separate vote for each ane every single law or appropriation by the congress?
Sure would slow down the ability of government to infringe on our freedom as well as our pocketbooks and would cut the earmarks and other wasteful spending dramatically!

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about requiring a separate vote for each ane every single law or appropriation by the congress?<br />
Sure would slow down the ability of government to infringe on our freedom as well as our pocketbooks and would cut the earmarks and other wasteful spending dramatically!</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About FREE MARKET UNDERDOG by racketmensch</title>
		<link>http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?page_id=2&#038;cpage=1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>racketmensch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Hi - I got here from a google ad on a page (teageegeepea.tripod.com) that I got from another link, from a yet another that was on a discussion of Ron Paul.  I still can&#039;t really get my mind around the non-recursive nature of the web - I&#039;m trying to deal with it temporarily by bookmarking everything that seems well-written and coherent.  I can&#039;t resist a page with no comments, though, because someone that obviously puts this much effort into building a site might appreciate knowing that they aren&#039;t speaking to an empty hall.  Google is great if you know what you&#039;re looking for in general, but sometimes I get the best stuff just randomly browsing.  I&#039;ll be back.  Go Ron Paul!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; I got here from a google ad on a page (teageegeepea.tripod.com) that I got from another link, from a yet another that was on a discussion of Ron Paul.  I still can&#8217;t really get my mind around the non-recursive nature of the web &#8211; I&#8217;m trying to deal with it temporarily by bookmarking everything that seems well-written and coherent.  I can&#8217;t resist a page with no comments, though, because someone that obviously puts this much effort into building a site might appreciate knowing that they aren&#8217;t speaking to an empty hall.  Google is great if you know what you&#8217;re looking for in general, but sometimes I get the best stuff just randomly browsing.  I&#8217;ll be back.  Go Ron Paul!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The US Supreme Court&#8217;s Terrible Decision on Eminent Domain by Jill Brown</title>
		<link>http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?p=3&#038;cpage=1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?p=3#comment-6</guid>
		<description>This is an absolute atrocity! Look up the definition of rapine or plunder. This should be listed as an example under each term. It&#039;s absolutely shocking that this could be even considered in the United States of America. What right does one have to take from me, regardless of what is offered for payment? Would you sell your child at any price? Maybe they will pass that next, they can take your first born if you are given &quot;just compensation&quot;. And then.. who can define just compensation-other than myself-for something that is owned by me? Sounds more like collectivism and socialism than the democracy we are supposed to live it. Everyone in America should stand up to this...that is if you place any value on the things you have worked for and own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an absolute atrocity! Look up the definition of rapine or plunder. This should be listed as an example under each term. It&#8217;s absolutely shocking that this could be even considered in the United States of America. What right does one have to take from me, regardless of what is offered for payment? Would you sell your child at any price? Maybe they will pass that next, they can take your first born if you are given &#8220;just compensation&#8221;. And then.. who can define just compensation-other than myself-for something that is owned by me? Sounds more like collectivism and socialism than the democracy we are supposed to live it. Everyone in America should stand up to this&#8230;that is if you place any value on the things you have worked for and own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CREATE A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT by admin</title>
		<link>http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?p=7&#038;cpage=1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freemarketunderdog.com/blog/?p=7#comment-4</guid>
		<description>RESPONSE to Bill Fargo asking Ã¢â‚¬Å“When will we stop tolerating treason?Ã¢â‚¬Â

Excellent question, which, of course, brings to mind Thomas JeffersonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s comment that Ã¢â‚¬Å“the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrantsÃ¢â‚¬Â.  

The question of when this will happen is, I think, largely a function of mass psychology. Right now the masses are still living at the height of complacency, oblivious to the fact that the bus is about to hurtle over the cliff. That bus, of course, is being driven by the nitwits, idiots and morons in Washington who are also clearly oblivious, spending their time, instead, to see which party can buy more votes with cash confiscated from the taxpayers.  

Unfortunately, history tells us that it takes cataclysmic events to move people from complacency to action. (As I like to say, revolutions are started on empty stomachs.) History also tells us that an early and necessary component of cataclysmic social change is financial calamity. Only after this country is ruined by a bankrupt federal government (and I mean a real bankruptcy, not the de facto kind we have now), will people feel compelled to water JeffersonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s tree.  

So, When does it start?, you ask? How about now?  

Keep in mind that the fall of the Roman Empire was not an event; it was a process. If youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve noticed the shaky foundations in the credit markets lately (see Ã¢â‚¬Å“sub-prime mortgage fiascoÃ¢â‚¬Â), thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the beginning of our process. Once weÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re all ruined financially and the masses realize that the Lender of Last Resort (otherwise known as Uncle Sam, if you can believe that cruel hoax of a phrase) can no longer hand out billions of dollars like Halloween suckers, then the watering will begin.  

As for my part, I wonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t be the first person to shoot my congressman Ã¢â‚¬â€œ I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t look good in an orange jumpsuit. But, like Samuel Adams and his associates, I wonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t shed a tear for the treasonous and tyrannical when the masses awake from their collective, complacent delusion and decide the tyrantsÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ fates.  

Free Market Underdog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RESPONSE to Bill Fargo asking Ã¢â‚¬Å“When will we stop tolerating treason?Ã¢â‚¬Â</p>
<p>Excellent question, which, of course, brings to mind Thomas JeffersonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s comment that Ã¢â‚¬Å“the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrantsÃ¢â‚¬Â.  </p>
<p>The question of when this will happen is, I think, largely a function of mass psychology. Right now the masses are still living at the height of complacency, oblivious to the fact that the bus is about to hurtle over the cliff. That bus, of course, is being driven by the nitwits, idiots and morons in Washington who are also clearly oblivious, spending their time, instead, to see which party can buy more votes with cash confiscated from the taxpayers.  </p>
<p>Unfortunately, history tells us that it takes cataclysmic events to move people from complacency to action. (As I like to say, revolutions are started on empty stomachs.) History also tells us that an early and necessary component of cataclysmic social change is financial calamity. Only after this country is ruined by a bankrupt federal government (and I mean a real bankruptcy, not the de facto kind we have now), will people feel compelled to water JeffersonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s tree.  </p>
<p>So, When does it start?, you ask? How about now?  </p>
<p>Keep in mind that the fall of the Roman Empire was not an event; it was a process. If youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve noticed the shaky foundations in the credit markets lately (see Ã¢â‚¬Å“sub-prime mortgage fiascoÃ¢â‚¬Â), thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the beginning of our process. Once weÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re all ruined financially and the masses realize that the Lender of Last Resort (otherwise known as Uncle Sam, if you can believe that cruel hoax of a phrase) can no longer hand out billions of dollars like Halloween suckers, then the watering will begin.  </p>
<p>As for my part, I wonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t be the first person to shoot my congressman Ã¢â‚¬â€œ I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t look good in an orange jumpsuit. But, like Samuel Adams and his associates, I wonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t shed a tear for the treasonous and tyrannical when the masses awake from their collective, complacent delusion and decide the tyrantsÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ fates.  </p>
<p>Free Market Underdog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

